Pearl Jam VS Nirvana

Discussion in 'Music Talk' started by Asmodeus, Feb 26, 2005.

?

Pearl Jam Or Nirvana

  1. Pearl Jam

    9 vote(s)
    30.0%

  2. Nirvana

    21 vote(s)
    70.0%
Page 1 of 3
  1. Asmodeus

    Asmodeus New Member

    I dunn even know why I amdoing this...
    1. Eddie Vedder or Cobain???
    2. Black or Nevermind???

    OR

    3. They both suck...
     
    Asmodeus, Feb 26, 2005
    #1
  2. Mr. Scary

    Mr. Scary Bass-tard Child

    definitley Pearl Jam over Nirvana.

    But Alice in Chains is better than both imo.
     
    Mr. Scary, Feb 26, 2005
    #2
  3. shak

    shak Harrr!

    3!!!..they both suck
     
    shak, Feb 26, 2005
    #3
  4. rizz

    rizz *Always 420*

    they both rockzz,..........
     
    rizz, Feb 26, 2005
    #4
  5. rizz

    rizz *Always 420*

    none

    .........................
     
    rizz, Feb 26, 2005
    #5
  6. JAZZ

    JAZZ New Member

    Nirvana ......
     
    JAZZ, Feb 26, 2005
    #6
  7. d_ist_urb_ed

    d_ist_urb_ed Genuflect b*tches!

    How can you even compare them? Pearl Jam is light years better than Nirvana. And all the above guys, you're being unfair to pearl jam arent you?:p: C'mon, it's not that bad:p:
     
    d_ist_urb_ed, Feb 26, 2005
    #7
  8. tejas

    tejas ..........

    I second that.
     
    tejas, Feb 26, 2005
    #8
  9. death_metal_fan

    death_metal_fan oh goody, it's a woody!

    Third that. Alice In Chains is definitely the best band to come out of the grunge movement.
     
    death_metal_fan, Feb 26, 2005
    #9
  10. light_of_erindi

    light_of_erindi New Member

    Right on....make that four....the unplugged album gives me the high !
     
    light_of_erindi, Feb 26, 2005
    #10
  11. guns n roses

    guns n roses Pro Guitarist

    i vote 4 number 3.

    Cobain was a real a.s.s.h.o.l.e
     
    guns n roses, Feb 26, 2005
    #11
  12. shak

    shak Harrr!

    oh yeah agree with some of you that pearl jam is better than nirvana ... but still they aint good enuf... so i stick with choice number 3 :)
     
    shak, Feb 27, 2005
    #12
  13. dharmatma

    dharmatma Banned

    ill opt for number four..
    guns n roses suck.
     
    dharmatma, Feb 27, 2005
    #13
  14. dharmatma

    dharmatma Banned

    im just trolling.
     
    dharmatma, Feb 27, 2005
    #14
  15. tejas

    tejas ..........

    ^Hehe. I don't think Alice In Chains can be beaten when it comes to grunge. R.I.P Layne.
     
    tejas, Feb 27, 2005
    #15
  16. guns n roses

    guns n roses Pro Guitarist

    ill opt for number 5

    5. There are some real di.ck.heads on IGT.
     
    guns n roses, Feb 27, 2005
    #16
  17. d_ist_urb_ed

    d_ist_urb_ed Genuflect b*tches!

    ^Chill out bro:) Known fact that GNR rules:)
     
    d_ist_urb_ed, Feb 27, 2005
    #17
  18. sanat_satan

    sanat_satan New Member

    i vote for 3...........both of them suck especially nirvana
     
    sanat_satan, Feb 27, 2005
    #18
  19. guns_n_gore

    guns_n_gore hell raiser

    :think: how cam u compare nirvana with pearl jam :mad: :mad: :mad:

    vedder was cool but still not enough
    :think:
     
    guns_n_gore, Feb 28, 2005
    #19
  20. Asmodeus

    Asmodeus New Member

    Why can't I compare Nirvana wth Pearl Jam???
    Eddie Vedder ruled Kurt's a$$.... Tho Dave Grohl was probably the best thing in Nirvana... yeah, I'm serious on that...

    P.S. I haven't heard much of Alice In Chains... will do now then...
    P.P.S. Ain't it mazin how all of us are getting to use the expletives by jus modifyin them... hahaha
     
    Asmodeus, Feb 28, 2005
    #20
Page 1 of 3

Share This Page