Musharraf your time is up.

Discussion in 'The ChitChat Lounge' started by waleed (London), Mar 14, 2007.

  1. shsnawada

    shsnawada Cyborgs & Pasta

    Still dont understand why tho. He's a good pet. And any regime change would result in a higher probability of an anti us government coming up but hey, everything that happens (mostly, bad. if its good, its bad but you just dont see it yet (sugar coated evil)) has a hand of teh zionization in it.

    Related (vaguely) : Bwahahahaness
     
  2. shak

    shak Harrr!

    meh ... back to square one ...
     
  3. Well its about Afghanistan really.

    The Americunts are insisting Musharaff hunt out the Taliban.
    (Notice not Al C.I.A.da).
    But He ain't playin ball.
    Infact the intelligence services think he is helping them but can't prove it.
    So he has to be replaced with a chosen (give or take a few million dollars) general that will.

    The Afghani's are giving the NATO forces a good pasting contrary to the Media reports.

    Just how many helicopter's can they say, fell out of the sky due to control failure and get away with it.
     
  4. jamhead

    jamhead Unknown Legend

    in what way is the cia helping the al qaida
     
  5. thehundredthone

    thehundredthone New Member

    T3h S3XXXORZZZZ!
     
  6. Do Your research Jammy.

    Who armed & funded Al qaida?

    How do we know there are not still?
     
  7. Dick Cheney, on his visit recently got dicked by Musharraf because he would not allow USA to launch attacks on IRAN form Baluachistan.
     
  8. jamhead

    jamhead Unknown Legend

    usa and cia and the west in general... but that was to fight the greater evil of ussr and communism.
    ussr and global communism is no more. thats how. the west has no more incentives to arm al quaida, more so since the al quaida has made the west its new targets now.
     
  9. shak

    shak Harrr!

    ^ and so they tell you ...


    taliban were usa's puppets once, they were used and then hung to dry ...

    taliban, saddam et all.
     
  10. jamhead

    jamhead Unknown Legend

    in foreign policy, there are no permanenet friends or permanent enemies... only permanent interests. it once suited american/western interests to back taliban, osama, al quaida, saddam, iranian shah, musharraf etc etc, and now its in their interest to "hang them to dry"
     
  11. shak

    shak Harrr!

    ^ agreed, and those temporary 'friends' arent in for the sake of friendship either .. they have their own interests ... monetary mostly.
     
  12. Pricisely why I have titled this as '.................your time is up'

    Jamhead my dear boy you are finally getting the picture.

    Glad to see the mist of patriotism which obscures peoples judgement begining to fade.
     
  13. shsnawada

    shsnawada Cyborgs & Pasta

    FTW? How can they hunt down a philosophy, when they clearly stated that they think that al qaida is a philosophy now?
    Either way, the risk of a hostile (to US) government coming in is more than any advantages the'll get by getting rid of muzz in my öpinioή.,

     
  14. shsnawada

    shsnawada Cyborgs & Pasta

    AhHAHAhahaA Amazing how the best in the world goes from "Radical Islamists protest", "Taliban on the rise", to "ZOMG, Musharaff has pink glasses?" :Q




    btw: Waleed: Do you really believe in the prophecy of the second coming of imran khan?

    Maybe he can seduce all his opponents to gay *** (with his gay image) and have a mass orgy somewhere close to gilgit?

    [​IMG]
    Gay Image​
     
  15. Keep taking the pills
     

Share This Page